Home
Search Meeting Sites
Planning Tools
Online Exclusives
Features & Insight
Subscribe
Advertise
Contact
Online Exclusive: Crisis Management
The 11 Steps Of Crisis Communications
 
By Jonathan Bernstein
 
Crisis: An unstable or crucial time or state of affairs whose outcome will make a decisive difference for better or worse (Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary).
 
Every organization is vulnerable to crises. The days of playing ostrich are gone. You can play, but your stakeholders will not be understanding or forgiving because they've watched what happened
with Bridgestone-Firestone, Bill Clinton, Arthur Anderson, Enron,
Worldcom, 9-11, The Asian Tsunami Disaster and - even as I write
this - Hurricane Katrina.
 
If you don't prepare, you WILL take more damage. And when I look
at existing "crisis management" plans when conducting a "crisis
document audit," what I often find is a failure to address the many communications issues related to crisis/disaster response. Organizations do not understand that, without adequate
communications:
 
¤ Operational response will break down.
 
¤ Stakeholders (internal and external) will not know what is
   happening and quickly be confused, angry, and negatively
   reactive.
 
¤ The organization will be perceived as inept, at best, and
   criminally negligent, at worst.
 
The basic steps of effective crisis communications are not
difficult, but they require advance work in order to minimize
damage. The slower the response, the more damage is incurred. So
if you're serious about crisis preparedness and response, read and
implement these 11 steps of crisis communications, the first eight
of which can and should be undertaken before any crisis occurs.
 
Here are The 11 Steps of Crisis Communications:
 
1. Identify Your Crisis Communications Team
 
    A small team of senior executives should be identified to serve
    as your company's Crisis Communications Team. Ideally, the team
    will be led by the company CEO, with the firm's top public
    relations executive and legal counsel as his or her chief
    advisers. If your in-house PR executive does not have sufficient
    crisis communications expertise, he or she may choose to retain
    an agency or independent consultant with that specialty. Other
    team members should be the heads of major company divisions, to
    include finance, personnel and operations.
   
    Let me say a word about legal counsel. Sometimes, during a
    crisis, a natural conflict arises between the recommendations of
    the company's legal counsel on the one hand, and those of the
    public relations counsel on the other. While it may be legally
    prudent not to say anything, this kind of reaction can land the
    company in public relations "hot water" that is potentially, as
    damaging, or even more damaging, than any financial or legal
    ramification. Fortunately, more and more legal advisors are
    becoming aware of this fact and are working in close cooperation
    with public relations counsel. The importance of this
    understanding cannot be underestimated. Arthur Anderson lost
    its case and went out of business due to the judgment rendered
    by the court of public opinion, not the judgment of a court of
    law.
 
2. Identify Spokespersons
 
    Within each team, there should be individuals who are the only
    ones authorized to speak for the company in times of crisis. The
    CEO should be one of those spokespersons, but not necessarily
    the primary spokesperson. The fact is that some chief executives
    are brilliant business people but not very effective in-person
    communicators. The decision about who should speak is made
    after a crisis breaks - but the pool of potential spokespersons
    should be identified and trained in advance.
   
    Not only are spokespersons needed for media communications, but
    for all types and forms of communications, internal and external,
    including on-camera, at a public meeting, at employee meetings,
    etc. You really don't want to be making decisions about so many
    different types of spokespersons while "under fire."
   
3. Spokesperson Training
 
    Two typical quotes from well-intentioned company executives
    summarize the reason why your spokespersons should receive
    professional training in how to speak to the media:
   
    ¤ "I talked to that nice reporter for over an hour and
       he didn't use the most important news about my
       organization."
   
    ¤ "I've done a lot of public speaking. I won't have any
       trouble at that public hearing."
 
    Regarding the first example, there are a good number of Mike
    Wallace's "60 Minutes" victims who thought they knew how to talk
    to the press. In the second case, most executives who have
    attended a hostile public hearing have gone home wishing they
    had been wearing a pair of Depends.
 
    All stakeholders - internal and external - are just as capable of
    misunderstanding or misinterpreting information about your
    organization as the media, and it's your responsibility to
    minimize the chance of that happening.
 
    In one example of such confusion, a completely healthy, well-
    managed $2 billion company's stock price dropped almost 25
    percent in one day because Dow Jones reported that a prominent
    securities firm had made a "sell" recommendation which it later
    denied ever making. The damage, of course, was already done.
 
    Spokesperson training teaches you to be prepared, to be ready
    to respond in a way that optimizes the response of all
    stakeholders.
 
4. Establish Communications Protocols
 
    Initial crisis-related news can be received at any level of a
    company. A janitor may be the first to know there is a problem,
    or someone in personnel, or notification could be in the form of
    a midnight phone call from an out-of-town executive. Who should
    be notified, and where do you reach them?
   
    An emergency communications "tree" should be established and
    distributed to all company employees, telling them precisely
    what to do and who to call if there appears to be a potential
    for or an actual crisis. In addition to appropriate supervisors,
    at least one member of the Crisis Communications Team, plus an
    alternate member, should include their cellphone, office and home
    phone numbers on the emergency contact list.
   
    Some companies prefer not to use the term "crisis," thinking that
    this may cause panic. Frankly, using "potentially embarrassing
    situations" or similar phrases doesn't fool anyone. Particularly
    if you prepare in advance, your employees will learn that
    "crisis" doesn't even necessarily mean "bad news," but simply
    "very important to our company, act quickly."
 
5. Identify and Know Your Stakeholders
 
    Who are the stakeholders that matter to your organization?
    Most organizations, for example, care about their employees,
    customers, prospects, suppliers and the media. Private investors
    may be involved. Publicly held companies have to comply with
    Securities and Exchange Commission and stock exchange
    Information requirements. You may answer to local, state or federal
    regulatory agencies.
 
6. Decide on Communications Methods
 
    For each stakeholder group, you need to have, in advance,
    complete emailing, snail-mailing, fax and phone number lists to
    accommodate rapid communication in time of crisis. And you need
    to know what type of information each stakeholder group is
    seeking, as well as the best way to reach each of your contacts.
   
    Another thing to consider is whether you have an automated
    system established to ensure rapid communication with those
    stakeholders. You should also think about backup communications
    options such as toll-free numbers for emergency call-ins or
    special Web sites that can be activated in times of crisis to
    keep various stakeholders informed and/or to conduct online
    incident management.
   
    Consider these factors in advance and rapid communication during
    crises will be relatively easy.
 
7. Anticipate Crises
 
    If you're being proactive and preparing for crises, gather your
    Crisis Communications Team for long brainstorming sessions on
    all the potential crises which can occur at your organization.
    There are at least two immediate benefits to this exercise:
 
    ¤ You may realize that some of the situations are preventable by
       simply modifying existing methods of operation.
   
    ¤ You can begin to think about possible responses, about best
       case/worst case scenarios, etc. Better now than when under the
       pressure of an actual crisis.
 
    In some cases, of course, you know that a crisis will occur
    because you're planning to create it -- e.g., to lay off employees,
    or to make a major acquisition. Then, you can proceed with steps
    9-11 below, even before the crisis occurs.
   
    There is a more formal method of gathering this information that
    I call a "vulnerability audit," about which information is
    available at my Web site, www.bernsteincrisismanagement.com.
 
8. Develop Holding Statements
 
    While full message development must await the outbreak of an
    actual crisis, "holding statements" - messages designed for use
    immediately after a crisis breaks - can be developed in advance
    to be used for a wide variety of scenarios to which the
    organization is perceived to be vulnerable, based on the
    assessment you conducted in Step 7 of this process. An example
    of holding statements by a hotel chain with properties hit by a
    natural disaster - before the company headquarters has any hard
    factual information - might be:
 
    "We have implemented our crisis response plan, which places the
    highest priority on the health and safety of our guests and
    staff."
 
    "Our hearts and minds are with those who are in harm's way, and
    we hope that they well."
 
    "We will be supplying additional information when it is
    available and posting it on our Web site."
 
    The organization's Crisis Communications Team should regularly
    review holding statements to determine if they require revision
    and/or whether statements for other scenarios should be
    developed.
 
9. Assess the Crisis Situation
 
    Reacting without adequate information is a classic "shoot first
    and ask questions afterwards" situation in which you could be
    the primary victim. But if you've done all of the above first,
    it's a "simple" matter of having the Crisis Communications Team
    on the receiving end of information coming in from your
    communications "tree," ensuring that the right type of
    information is being provided so that you can proceed with
    determining the appropriate response.
   
    Assessing the crisis situation is, therefore, the first crisis
    communications step you can't take in advance. But if you
    haven't prepared in advance, your reaction will be delayed by
    the time it takes your in-house staff or quickly-hired
    consultants to run through steps 1 to 8. Furthermore, a hastily
   created crisis communications strategy and team are never as
    efficient as those planned and rehearsed in advance.
   
10. Identify Key Messages
 
    With holding statements available as a starting point, the
    Crisis Communications Team must continue developing the crisis-
    specific messages required for any given situation. The team
    already knows, categorically, what type of information its
    stakeholders are looking for. What should those stakeholders
    know about *this* crisis? Keep it simple -- have no more than
    three main messages for all stakeholders and, as necessary, some
    audience-specific messages for individual groups of stakeholders.
 
11. Riding Out the Storm
 
    No matter what the nature of a crisis...no matter whether it's
    good news or bad...no matter how carefully you've prepared and
    responded...some of your stakeholders are not going to react the
    way you want them to. This can be immensely frustrating. What do
    you do?
 
    ¤ Take a deep breath.
 
    ¤ Take an objective look at the reaction(s) in question. Is it
       your fault, or their unique interpretation?
   
    ¤ Decide if another communication to those stakeholders is
       likely to change their impression for the better.
   
   ¤ Decide if another communication to those stakeholders could
       make the situation worse.
      
    ¤ If, after considering these factors, you think it's still
       worth more communication, then take your best shot!
 
Final Thoughts…
 
When a healthy organization's CEO or CFO looks at the cost of
preparing a crisis communications plan, either a heavy investment
of in-house time or retention of an outside professional for a
substantial fee, it is tempting for them to fantasize "it can't
happen to me" or "if it happens to me, we can handle it relatively
easily."
 
Hopefully, that type of ostrich-playing is rapidly becoming a
thing of the past. Yet I know that thousands of organizations hit
by Hurricane Katrina will have, when all is said and done,
suffered far more damage than would have occurred with a fully
developed crisis communications plan in place. This has also been
painfully true for scores of clients I have served over the past 23
years. Even the best crisis management professional is playing
catch up - with more damage occurring all the time - when the
organization has no crisis communications infrastructure already
in place.
 
I would like to believe that organizations worldwide are finally
"getting it" about crisis preparedness, whether we're talking
about crisis communications, disaster response or business
continuity. Certainly client demand for advance preparation has
increased dramatically in the past several years, at least for my
consultancy. But I fear that there is, in fact, little change in
what I have said in the past, that 95 percent of American
organizations remain either completely unprepared or significantly
under-prepared for crises. And my colleagues overseas report little better, and sometimes worse statistics.
 
Choose to be part of the prepared minority. Your stakeholders will
appreciate it!
 
Jonathan L. Bernstein, President/CEO of Bernstein Communications, Inc. His 20 years experience in the design and conduct of public relations and strategic communications programs, with particular expertise in what is commonly called "Crisis Management," but which Bernstein Communications breaks down into "Crisis Response," "Issues Management" and “Litigation Consulting”. His clients are from every industry including real estate giants such as the Lyle Anderson Companies, Del Webb Corporation and WCI Communities.
Meeting tips & the latest news from the Southeast sent to your inbox.Sign Up
Tell us what you think...
Has the AIG-Effect fizzled or is it still holding strong?
Destinations & Attractions
Find out all about the local hot spots for hosting meetings in the South.Let's Go
 

GSA Spending

The GSA inspector general's report that uncovered excessive conference spending by GSA is in the hands of the Justice Dept. for possible criminal charges. Do you think GSA officials should be charged with a crime?

2012 Meeting Pros To Watch

Nominate meeting and event planners, and convention services managers for our monthly and annual Meeting Pro To Watch Awards.

Go

Annual Readers' Choice Awards

Let us know your picks for the South's most creative and professional CVBs, conventions centers, hotels and other meeting sites.

Go

Top Events Award

Was an event held at your site or destination creatively and professionally executed? If so, nominate it for our annual recognition.

Go

Top New & Renovated Honors

Nominate your pick for the top meeting sites that are newly opened and top sites that have recently renovated or expanded.

Go
Website Development by JDT Technologies